> -----Original Message----- > From: dmarc [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Terry Zink > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 12:37 PM > To: Franck Martin; Matt Simerson > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC. > > > Franck Martin wrote: > > > > I found that to build the override list for mailing list, I could log > > DMARC rejected emails that contained a List-Id or List-Post header. > > Once reviewing the logs (once a week, or once a month), you can make > > an easy decision if you want to add the found IPs into your override list. > > That was my thinking, too. > > I like the idea of DKIM-Delegate but if I had to choose between doing > Franck's whitelist [1] suggestion above, or DKIM-Delegate, I'd probably do > the whitelist because it's less code to implement and maintain; as someone > who fights spam we're already in the business of checking logs looking for > patterns and doing overrides and so this would simply be one more pattern > to look for. > > -- Terry > > [1] whitelist = override the DMARC p=reject/quarantine action, not skip all > filtering >
And this fits squarely within the DMARC local policy space. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
