On 6/10/2014 9:11 AM, Vlatko Salaj wrote: > On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 8:49 AM, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-dkim-list-canon/ >>> the master-piece of DKIM messiness. unfortunately, >>> it doesn't solve current ML problem, but introduces >>> new ML requirements. >> So rather than offer dismissive, summary comments, >> please offer criticisms of technical substance. > > i would rather not waste time on elaborate thesis > about YADA [yet another DKIM addon]. someone who has > time will do it and they can add my vote apriori.
I'm a bit confused. You think it is ok to waste everyone's time by offering your personal, summary-dismissal notes, but not substantive criticism? An example of why postings like you've sent are unhelpful is that it implicitly invites others to offer summarily-dismissive notes about your notes. There's nothing productive about such a path. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
