On 7/2/2014 9:51 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > Clarity and comprehensibility are very important from my POV[2]. For > that sake, I suggest the charter mention candidate solutions such as > DKIM-Delegate and TPA-Labels explicitly. Some further wordsmithing > may be advisable too. > > It probably wouldn't be harmful to list them as possible inputs to the > work, so that people reviewing the charter have some context, so long as > doing so doesn't also constrain the WG's options.
The charter won't be directing the wg to 'start with' or 'work from' or 'build upon' or any equivalent constraint, for these drafts, I think the simplest approach is just to add these citations to the References section. (Actually meant to do that originally.) d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
