On 7/3/14 12:20 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
On 7/3/14 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 11:22:18AM -0500, Pete Resnick wrote:
Oh, I forgot one thing:
The working group will seek to maintain
the viability of stable domain-level identifiers in mail, and will
document existing mail streams that do not conform to the DMARC
model.
I'm not sure what this means. Can someone explain?
I still don't understand. Can we just strike this text?
I'll bet a pretty good lunch that it's the way of saying, "Rewriting
[email protected] to [email protected] is not
allowed." That's something that people have started doing for mailing
lists. But I can't say for sure that's what it means.
Oh. If so, perhaps we could come up with a slightly less obscure way
of saying it?
Well, nobody has stepped up to the plate to help, so I'm going to go
with the following:
"As the working group develops solutions to deal with indirect mail
flows, it will seek to maintain the end-to-end nature of existing
identifier fields in mail, in particular avoiding solutions that require
rewriting of originator fields."
If you've got concerns with that, we'll take them up as "comments to the
IESG on the proposed charter."
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
