On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Miles Fidelman <mfidel...@meetinghouse.net> wrote:
> I did notice the absence of anything related to process. How are we going > to get to a "document (that) captures all known interoperability issue > between DMARC and indirect email flows?" If this were an RFC, there'd be > an author or authors identified, maybe a draft to start from. > Since in essence we're only talking about milestones, I disagree. I've never seen a set of milestones on a WG charter or otherwise that name specific people who will complete them. For some of these there is indeed a draft to start from, named in the charter. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
