On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Tim Draegen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Aug 24, 2014, at 10:35 PM, Kurt Andersen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Once the milestones discussion has settled..., Ned and myself will > create an outline of topics and work items that, when worked through, > should have the WG arrive at its deliverables. > > > > =- Tim > > What about adopting a somewhat more agile, less waterfall strategy? > > > So, the WG will maintain an "official focus" that will track the > milestones to allow for wider participation. That said, work on items that > are ahead of the official focus (or even behind if something is overlooked > and important) is most definitely encouraged, because it doesn't make sense > to nip constructive work in the bud just to follow process. The only > caveat I can think of is that topics/work-items will necessarily remain > open until the WG officially focuses on them (again with the aim of > inviting wide participation). > > I hope the above is an acceptable compromise between remaining agile with > respect to work items while keeping a schedule for those of that require an > explicit time & place to be productive. > That sounds reasonable to me. Thanks for the detail. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
