Tim Draegen wrote:
On Aug 23, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Miles Fidelman <[email protected]> wrote:
I did notice the absence of anything related to process. How are we going to get to a
"document (that) captures all known interoperability issue between DMARC and
indirect email flows?" If this were an RFC, there'd be an author or authors
identified, maybe a draft to start from.
At a minimum, it seems like someone might want to generate an initial outline,
and set it up as a wiki where folks can start providing input.
Hi Miles, you're right. There is very little around process today. Once the
milestones discussion has settled (as I probably too briefly mentioned to Dave
Crocker in this thread), Ned and myself will create an outline of topics and
work items that, when worked through, should have the WG arrive at its
deliverables.
This outline should give everyone a clear picture and plenty of opportunity to
volunteer. !
=- Tim
Makes sense. I always figure that milestones go hand in hand with
approach to the work at hand. With that caveat, milestones look good to
me, modulo the comment about holidays.
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
