On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 11:40 PM [GMT+1=CET], Douglas Otis wrote: > Dear DMARC WG, > > Now that RFC7489 has been published, there remains several > unresolved problems this WG is charted to resolve, primarily-- > 1. Addressing the issues with indirect mail flows
Why is it better for DMARC to be adapted to indirect email flows, instead of indirect email flows to be adapted to DMARC? What does provide more value to end users at large: indirect email flows to be kept old-style, or the extra notch of trustworthiness that DMARC alignment provides? How big is the volume of DMARC-problematic indirect email flows, compared to the general volume of email which can readily benefit from DMARC? Regards, Regards, J.Gomez _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
