On 4/26/2015 8:34 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
GNU Mailman, for example, provides several DMARC mitigations. The traditionally available "just forward" configuration is still available, but disliked strongly because users really like have unsubscribe and archive links in the footer. The "steal authorship" option is available since Oct 2013 (6 months before the April Fiasco). Encapsulation of the decorated message in a message/rfc822 MIME part was provided later in 2013 IIRC. The problem is that all are detested by some users, and none are actually liked by any user. Therefore we developers continue to seek alternatives -- but all desirable alternatives require cooperation of "p=reject" posting domains because of the nature of current validation/ authentication protocols as Originator-Receiver agreements.
The mediator has a receiver. Doesn't it have the same Originator-Receiver agreements?
-- HLS _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
