On Monday, April 27, 2015 2:34 AM [GMT+1=CET], Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > Well, I don't "attack" anyone, I express my opinion about what I > > think would be the easiest and lest painful --considering the email > > system as a whole-- solution to the problem. > > It's already available, and already used when the actual participants > in a mediated channel so prefer. Your expression of opinion therefore > is useless
I am sorry my opinion is useless to you. It does not intent to have an utility per se, but to express my point of view as an actor in the email system. > > I also feel I am advocating my users's best interests. I am not mad > > at you, don't be mad at me. :-) > > Why is it in *your* users' interests to tell *me* how to run my lists? > That's what I perceive as an attack, since I see no good reason. You asked "What else do you propose that we do?". I obliged. Again, I am sorry you didn't like it. Regards, J.Gomez _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
