Hector Santos writes:
 > On 4/26/2015 8:34 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

 > > The problem is that all are detested by some users, and none are
 > > actually liked by any user.  Therefore we developers continue to seek
 > > alternatives -- but all desirable alternatives require cooperation of
 > > "p=reject" posting domains because of the nature of current validation/
 > > authentication protocols as Originator-Receiver agreements.
 > 
 > The mediator has a receiver.  Doesn't it have the same 
 > Originator-Receiver agreements?

The effects are different.  According to DMARC, a message which passes
at the Mediator, will fail at the next Receiver.

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to