Barry et al,

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Seth Blank <[email protected]> wrote:

> The current spec defines an arc authres method (
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-protocol-03#section-8.1).
>
> We believe there should also be registered ptypes and properties, that
> should be stamped (but are not required, as they won't always be available).
>
> As long as AR stamping happens at the end of chain validation, when an ARC
> set gets created this stamp will be included in the AAR, and AAR
> construction can be clean with no additional language or requirements
> necessary in the spec.
>

This area seems like something that would be productively explored in a F2F
since it is pretty undefined right now and there are some divergent
opinions kicking around... (see the thread with Brandon and Scott so far)

--Kurt
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to