On 3/11/2018 5:02 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
I have uploaded a preliminary session agenda here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/agenda-101-dmarc
the agenda shows:
> 18:15 25 min Next steps, including:
- draft-akagiri-dmarc-virtual-verification
That's quite a long time to discuss something that isn't really dmarc.
DMARC introduces the alignment construct, publication of a policy
record, and a reporting mechanism.
The proposal is to take note of alignment, independent of whether the
domain owner has published a policy about it. Having a report take note
of validated alignment well might be worth doing, but it's not DMARC.
My impression is that after ARC, the industry interest is in finding a
path that standardizes DMARC. This proposal does not serve that goal.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
