On Mar 13, 2018, at 9:42 AM, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Phase III: >> Review and refinement of the DMARC specification > > Is there technical work on the base specification that would improve it?
The bug tracker contains a few items around clarification, removing ambiguity, correcting minor mistakes. Nothing major. I was expecting someone to come up with a new tag that defined a mechanism for exception querying. EG, I have a piece of email that falls under a DMARC record where the Domain Owner is telling me I can query some resource to figure out if the identifier combination is OK. Aside from hallway conversation, haven't seen anything like it yet. >> Completion of Guide on DMARC Usage > > What will it take to complete this doc? Focus & cycles. The document is meant for future implementors. There has been *some* leg work done to collect information. There was talk of rechartering to remove this deliverable, but I hope that has been addressed. =- Tim > > One example would be a spec revision effort that targets clarification, > based on experience coding and deploying DMARC. > > > I'll also suggest that it would help allay public concerns about DMARC to > be able to have this document include experience-based text about ARC usage; > both discussing how to use it and how effective it is. > > d/
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
