On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Steven M Jones <s...@crash.com> wrote:

> On 3/15/18 10:19 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
>
>
>    - Creating a diagnostic report that would have some additional
>    information (such as sending address) and URLs without going quite as far
>    as a forensic report - so something between the aggregate and forensic
>    levels
>
>
> I'm probably missing something, but -- aren't email addresses usually
> classed as PII in the EU, whether they're sending or receiving at the
> moment? Seems to me it would run afoul of the privacy regs that tend to
> rule out forensic reports in certain jurisdictions...
>
> Maybe there's a batch/aggregate angle vs.  per-message that helps avoid
> that concern? Would time and URLs alone be useful enough to warrant the
> effort and expense?
>

There are two aspects to this -

   1. batching (lightens the load for reporting receivers), and
   2. re privacy - the fact that someone with authority (over the domain)
   has requested said reports suffices for GDPR legal/consent coverage

--Kurt
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to