Considering that the qld.gov.au record includes an sp tag, I'd say that they intend and expect that the TLD entry does exactly that - puts DMARC reporting in place for all subdomains that don't have their own record.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Tomki Camp <[email protected]> wrote: > Currently defined policy discovery https://tools.ietf.org/html/rf > c7489#section-6.6.3 > > This begs the question (for which a real example now exists): what if a > listed suffix (TLD?) itself has a DMARC record? Is the intent and expected > behaviour that the TLD entry override all instances where a record is not > explicitly defined? Or should there also be an Organizational level check > along the way? Or something else? > > Current use case: > qld.gov.au is in the PSL, *and* has a DMARC record of its own. When > looking up whether company.qld.gov.au has a DMARC record, all public > tools I tried say 'no record' except MXtoolbox, which shows that the entry > inherits from qld.gov.au > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc > > -- PAUL ROCK *Sr Software Dev Engineer* | AOL Mail P: 703-265-5734 | C: 703-980-8380 AIM: paulsrock 22070 Broderick Dr.| Dulles, VA | 20166-9305
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
