On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 3:17 PM, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
> I think it's fine to sign and hope for the best, but how is a > validator supposed to tell the difference? Perhaps we need something > like cv=restart. > So that's where this specific thread started if you roll back to the very first message. The working group considered cv=invalid last year, but there was strong consensus was against it. The guidance for Sealing cv=invalid Chains somehow made it into this draft applied to all cv=fail Chains. All Chains should be Sealed in the same fashion (your AS covers the ARC Set you've added and all previous ARC Sets), unless the Chain is invalid in which case you only Seal your own ARC Set. We could add a comment about cv=invalid into Experimental Considerations. If not being able to tell the cases apart creates issues, it can absolutely be added once we are considering the standardization of ARC.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
