On Wed, 15 Aug 2018, Dave Crocker wrote:
Modest, indeed. Also unknown.
This is building in a permanent behavior, for a use that is, at best, vague
conjecture.
Well, sure, but we could say that about all of ARC. As far as I know
nobody has any rules yet for evaluating ARC chains beyond "if it was
originally from us and the chain is good, it's probably OK."
The cost of adding the cv=fail signature is pretty low, and I don't see
any way that it would make things worse.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
