I'm still at a bit of a loss as to how one can effectively do a "greedy"
seal over a broken chain in a deterministic fashion.

I've been discussing this with Seth. Particularly once we start doing parallel chains for different algorithms, different implementations will disagree about what's a broken chain, so I'd just as soon not try.

If the previous seal was good, add cv=fail only signing your own seal. If the previous seal was cv=fail, don't sign.

Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to