On Mon, 20 Aug 2018, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
No, by subsequent I mean intermediaries who handle the message after the point of initial "oh, this is broken" determination. So if I'm the 5th intermediary (let's assume that all are ARC participating for this discussion), and the chain on the message that I receive does not pass the validation checks (for any of the three possible reasons), then my report is meaningful to the sender but reports from 6, 7, 8, etc are not.
Ah, that. You're right. One the chain is broken, we have no idea where the message came from and it's just another bit of spam bouncing around the net.
Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
