In article <9957335.dUWMaE32Bo@kitterma-e6430> you write: >Does it have to be any harder than that?
I hope not but it's still not backward compatible so it's not really any better. With the current spec, if you have two AMS or AS with the same i= that's invalid, so if you start putting both rsa and ed25519 seals, old verifiers will probably fail. It'd be interesting to mock up dual seals, send them to Gmail et al, and see what they think. I suppose we could invent new headers EAMS and EAS and EAAR for the second and later version of seals, but ugh. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
