On Fri, Nov 2, 2018, 18:09 John R Levine <[email protected] wrote: > On Fri, 2 Nov 2018, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote: > >> I mean ARC as it's implemented now, not in our multi-signing draft. > > It seems like a poor implementation choice to be enforcing something > which > > is not part of the spec :-), especially when there are parenthetical > > comments and references to things like ARC-MULTI to warn you against > > leaping to foot-shooting enforcement choices. > > I see it also says: > > Valid ARC Sets MUST have exactly one instance of each ARC header > field (AAR, AMS, and AS) for a given instance value and signing > algorithm. > > I'm reasonably sure that doesn't match a lot of running code. I'm > particularly thinking of gmail here. >
That should be easy to test but not with a tiny keyboard as I board my flight from ICN --> BKK. --Kurt >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
