On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 8:56 AM John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > In article <9957335.dUWMaE32Bo@kitterma-e6430> you write: > >Does it have to be any harder than that? > > I hope not but it's still not backward compatible so it's not really any > better. > > With the current spec, if you have two AMS or AS with the same i= > that's invalid, >
No, it is not invalid. We did try to downplay the details a bit in the spec, but if you use a different signing algorithm, you can have as many ARC sets with the same instance as you have legal algorithms. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
