My concern with this approach (which doesn't rise to the level of objecting to its application as a WG document, though perhaps it should) is that it is trending toward needing an IANA registry to be queryable in real-time, and I don't believe they are equipped with the infrastructure to provide that kind of service, nor is that likely to happen anytime soon.
-MSK On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 9:33 AM Kurt Andersen (b) <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 2:17 AM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Can we have a brief discussion on what exactly is the purpose of the I-D? >> > > The intent is to allow the expression of a DMARC policy which would cover > non-existent org domains under a "longest public suffix". Right now, there > is no way to do that. > > >> At a first glance, it seems an attempt to override the Public Suffix List >> with >> a IANA registry. >> > > The IANA registry listing is to constrain which LPSs are exerting such > claims and to prevent abuse such as happened a few years ago on web > wildcards. > > --Kurt > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
