Agree with John but from the dns side, simpler solutions tend to get traction
faster.
John May agree with that.
Sure. My DBOUND approach was pretty simple, using no new rrtypes or other
magic.
From my high tech gadget
On Nov 8, 2018, at 15:47, John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018, tjw ietf wrote:
I remember the two hog mentioned but there could of been a third.
At this point I can't find any of the drafts other than mine, and a problem
statement mostly by Andrew Sullivan.
In any event, I agree it's worth having the WG take a whack at this, keeping in
mind that its history is not encouraging.
R's,
John
From my high tech gadget
On Nov 8, 2018, at 15:19, Kurt Andersen (b) <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:17 PM John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
In article <[email protected]> you write:
Unfortunately, I didn't come up with an idea for how to do this in DNS. This
seems like a legitimate issue
for the WG to work through.
There were two DNS proposals in DBOUND, a more complex one from Casey
Deccio and a simpler one from me. Mine would certainly work for identifying
org domains.
I thought that there was a third one from Andrew too, but let's defer getting
into the discussion until we get this proposal adopted into the WG.
Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
