On Wednesday, November 07, 2018 11:37:24 AM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:08 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > My concern with this approach (which doesn't rise to the level of > > objecting to its application as a WG document, though perhaps it should) > > is > > that it is trending toward needing an IANA registry to be queryable in > > real-time, and I don't believe they are equipped with the infrastructure > > to > > provide that kind of service, nor is that likely to happen anytime soon. > > This issue or something like it came up when I was chairing WEIRDS, so > that's where this is coming from. > > There are IANA folks here at IETF this week. I'll ask them.
Thanks, My estimation is that this would change very rarely. If I were developing software for this, I'd probably check at build time and use that unless there are some reason to update. Not that people won't try, but I think not very real time is sufficient. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
