In article <[email protected]>, A. Schulze <[email protected]> wrote: > When evaluating "www.foo.example.com", the first query would be to > "www.foo.example._bound.com". If the reply to this is "BOUND 0 0 > com", then the second query would go to > "www.foo._bound.example.com". > >I ask myself if DNS query minimisation could be contrary to the query >sequence for subdomains. >QNAME minimization is normally performed by recursive resolvers. So it >should not disturb. >But for cases where an application implement that logic it would be >good to point to RFC 7616.
I worry that if we try to enumerate every possible dumb way someone might implement even a very simple design, we will end up with a very very very long document. R's, John -- Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
