On Mon 11/Nov/2019 07:30:05 +0100 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 7:54 AM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote: > >> About the new ptype, a reviewer suggested to also use it to report >> whether the query supported DNSSEC. No DNSWL that I know supports it. >> However, I know some DKIM filters report that feature either as a comment >> or as a reason in the dkim= methodspec. Using the new ptype might make >> that clearer. Consider:>> >> Authentication-Results: example.com; >> dkim=pass dns.sec=yes [email protected] header.b=j5aQ3SJv >> > > Are there any MTAs that would take a different action based on this > information?
Nobody cares about DNSSEC, until they fall victim to DNS hijacking attacks. If the property is there, it may be easier to retrofit a fix in that case. Best Ale -- _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
