On Tue 03/Dec/2019 21:22:28 +0100 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > Assuming the ptype we're talking about is "dns" which is defined in the same > document, the definition is terse and there's not much guidance for the > designated expert about what things should be allowed with respect to future > registrations. I think Scott basically said the same thing. I'd like to see > those points addressed before green lighting it.
The doc just says "The property being reported belongs to the Domain Name System". I think that definition broadly includes any tag found in a domain's TXT record. For example, we could agree that within a resinfo of a given method, any dns ptype refers to tags in the relevant record or retrieval thereof, unless otherwise specified. So one could have, say: Authentication-Results: example.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=example.net dns.sec=y; dkim=pass [email protected] header.b=jIvx30NG dns.s=tlsrpt The point is where would such kind of convention be made explicit. I don't see what additional text can be added to the dnswl I-D in order to make that issue clearer. Any proposal? Best Ale -- _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
