> Hmm, we didn't include this in RFC 8616 either, I could imagine that it
> should be punycoded also, though it really depends on whether in 6532 or
> 5322.
Why punycoded? Section 2.5 does not specify that it needs to be a domain
name, even though it usually is.

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to