On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 2:23 PM John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > In article < > caba8r6ttpateyprsgbwkafzvz4u8v8sn1vptpmlqcia2_+5...@mail.gmail.com> you > write: > >-=-=-=-=-=- > > > >Hmm, we didn't include this in RFC 8616 either, I could imagine that it > >should be punycoded also, though it really depends on whether in 6532 or > >5322. > > This is another mistake in the ABNF in 8601. The point of 6532 is > that with the exception of Message-IDs, any header fields that used to > be limited to ASCII can now contain UTF-8 printable characters. >
Does someone have a fix in mind that could be submitted as an erratum? The intent was indeed to make the authserv-id either a plain old ASCII domain name or an A-label which doesn't need quoting. I missed that RFC 6532 didn't update "value", unfortunately. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
