On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:43 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:21 PM John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Does someone have a fix in mind that could be submitted as an erratum? >> The >> > intent was indeed to make the authserv-id either a plain old ASCII >> domain >> > name or an A-label which doesn't need quoting. I missed that RFC 6532 >> > didn't update "value", unfortunately. >> >> Unfortunately, 8601's defintion is a mess. At the bottom of page 15 it >> says this about authserv-id, which contradicts the ABNF: >> [...] >> > > OK, what does the WG think might be the best way to clean it up? > I think that John's suggestion (ABNF: " authserv-id = domain-name ") makes the most sense and the fewest contortions. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
