On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 1:39 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:23 PM Seth Blank <seth= > [email protected]> wrote: > >> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/51 >> >> In a DMARC aggregate report, a record with a disposition of "none" is >> ambiguous, as a disposition of "none" at p=none means a different thing >> (that no action was taken on the message) than a disposition of "none" if >> the DMARC policy is reject or quarantine (the message passed an aligned >> authentication check of either SPF or DKIM, and was therefore not subject >> to policy). >> >> It is desirable to have logically distinct disposition responses, and if >> so, what should be reported in the latter case? As a straw man, "pass" >> instead of "none"? >> > > Given the choices, I like "pass". > +1 to pass - but I'd go further than Ale and use pass whenever the DMARC evaluation passes regardless of the policy setting in the DMARC record. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
