On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 8:12 AM Seth Blank <s...@valimail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 8:01 AM Kurt Andersen (b) <kb...@drkurt.com> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:50 PM Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote: >> >>> On 9/29/2020 3:08 PM, Seth Blank wrote: >>> > I don't know of any receiver that checks DMARC, but then doesn't check >>> > alignment >>> >>> It's not a matter of field statistics: >>> >>> Since checking alignment is an obvious part of the DMARC >>> procedure, if someone does not follow the specification, they are not >>> doing DMARC. >>> >> >> Does that mean that "none" is not an appropriate verdict? >> > > No, per https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7489#appendix-C "none" is the only > option for when a policy action is not undertaken: > > <!-- The policy actions specified by p and sp in the > DMARC record. --> > <xs:simpleType name="DispositionType"> > <xs:restriction base="xs:string"> > <xs:enumeration value="none"/> > <xs:enumeration value="quarantine"/> > <xs:enumeration value="reject"/> > </xs:restriction> > </xs:simpleType> > > The point of this thread, and where consensus appears to lie, is adding > another value to disambiguate the use cases. > Hit send too fast, that's only part of the relevant schema, the rest (which uses the above) is: <!-- Taking into account everything else in the record, the results of applying DMARC. --> <xs:complexType name="PolicyEvaluatedType"> <xs:sequence> * <xs:element name="disposition" type="DispositionType"/>* <xs:element name="dkim" type="DMARCResultType"/> <xs:element name="spf" type="DMARCResultType"/> <xs:element name="reason" type="PolicyOverrideReason" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> > > >> --Kurt >> > > > -- > > *Seth Blank* | VP, Standards and New Technologies > *e:* s...@valimail.com > *p:* 415.273.8818 > > > This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or > proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) > authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized > recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or > distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited > and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to > this email and then delete it from your system. > -- *Seth Blank* | VP, Standards and New Technologies *e:* s...@valimail.com *p:* 415.273.8818 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
