On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:15 AM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> +1.  The rationale, AIUI, is that if the receiver successfully evaluated
> alignment, then "pass" is fine.  If the receiver didn't evaluate anything
> after
> it saw p=none, then "none" is fine.  <dkim> and <spf> should agree.
>

If a receiver does not check alignment, then "none" would be the right
report, regardless of DMARC policy in the DNS record. (One could argue for "
¯\_(ツ)_/¯" instead of none, but I don't know how interoperable that would
be)

If DMARC is fully evaluated, including alignment, then "pass" would be
better.

--Kurt
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to