On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:18 AM Dotzero <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd also like to see calls for consensus rather than a declaration of > consensus by the chairs based on posts from a very small minority of the > members of the list. >
I'm confused. Can you point to a thread where you feel like this happened? For the tickets, we've been very careful to report what we believe the consensus is, and to ask the list for more commentary if only a minority of members have spoken up. If no one objects, then we record the consensus in the ticket and close it out. I do not believe there have been any objections to consensus as recorded in the tickets. If you feel this is not the case, please engage in the appropriate threads. The chairs have been diligently working multiple items behind the scenes so that we can speed up the cadence of ticket resolution. As of this week, most document editors are locked, and we're just finalizing the last few. As Tim noted, once that's done, we expect ticket cadence to pick up dramatically. If there's still an issue after that point, then we'll revisit the process. Seth, as Chair -- *Seth Blank* | VP, Standards and New Technologies *e:* [email protected] *p:* 415.273.8818 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
