This email is a strong sign you need to study up on how the IETF works. Scott K
On Friday, September 25, 2020 4:41:23 PM EDT Doug Foster wrote: > It appeared to me that adoption had the plurality of votes, by my estimate > something like 6 to 3. But the objections to the document were > substantial and the proponents of proceeding said nothing during the call > to indicate that those objections can be mitigated. > > > > One of those problems is “How will the mediator know whether the target > domain will honor the new method or not?” > > This is a trivial variant of the existing problem “How does the mediator > know whether the target domain is enforcing DMARC against the list messages > or not?” > > > > Experimental status assumes that the participants are known, so it cannot > address this fundamental issue. > > > > DF > > > > > > > > From: dmarc [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Seth Blank > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 2:53 PM > To: Dotzero; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Can we consider some process changes to speed > attainment of conclusions? > > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:18 AM Dotzero <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd also like to see calls for consensus rather than a declaration of > consensus by the chairs based on posts from a very small minority of the > members of the list. > > > > I'm confused. Can you point to a thread where you feel like this happened? > > > > For the tickets, we've been very careful to report what we believe the > consensus is, and to ask the list for more commentary if only a minority of > members have spoken up. If no one objects, then we record the consensus in > the ticket and close it out. I do not believe there have been any > objections to consensus as recorded in the tickets. If you feel this is not > the case, please engage in the appropriate threads. > > > > The chairs have been diligently working multiple items behind the scenes so > that we can speed up the cadence of ticket resolution. As of this week, > most document editors are locked, and we're just finalizing the last few. > As Tim noted, once that's done, we expect ticket cadence to pick up > dramatically. > > > > If there's still an issue after that point, then we'll revisit the process. > > > > Seth, as Chair _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
