It appeared to me that adoption had the plurality of votes, by my estimate 
something like 6 to 3.   But the objections to the document were substantial 
and the proponents of proceeding said nothing during the call to indicate that 
those objections can be mitigated.

 

One of those problems is “How will the mediator know whether the target domain 
will honor the new method or not?”   

This is a trivial variant of the existing problem “How does the mediator know 
whether the target domain is enforcing DMARC against the list messages or not?”

 

Experimental status assumes that the participants are known, so it cannot 
address this fundamental issue.

 

DF

 

 

 

From: dmarc [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Seth Blank
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 2:53 PM
To: Dotzero; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Can we consider some process changes to speed 
attainment of conclusions?

 

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:18 AM Dotzero <[email protected]> wrote:

I'd also like to see calls for consensus rather than a declaration of consensus 
by the chairs based on posts from a very small minority of the members of the 
list. 

 

I'm confused. Can you point to a thread where you feel like this happened?

 

For the tickets, we've been very careful to report what we believe the 
consensus is, and to ask the list for more commentary if only a minority of 
members have spoken up. If no one objects, then we record the consensus in the 
ticket and close it out. I do not believe there have been any objections to 
consensus as recorded in the tickets. If you feel this is not the case, please 
engage in the appropriate threads.

 

The chairs have been diligently working multiple items behind the scenes so 
that we can speed up the cadence of ticket resolution. As of this week, most 
document editors are locked, and we're just finalizing the last few. As Tim 
noted, once that's done, we expect ticket cadence to pick up dramatically.

 

If there's still an issue after that point, then we'll revisit the process.

 

Seth, as Chair

 

-- 

Seth Blank | VP, Standards and New Technologies

e: [email protected]

p: 415.273.8818 

  
<https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/_vs__6iRjfmT2Ae5LLNBb8nEopl2M5Tl5QlpS6LS0Lh0vv4TYnZu-Mff2kDFOqe0LhbnSXprAx4yoaTvq_Tc_7n1b8yzGIqoxuhedthDxYQansg8ChT2x5EcZV3rjz19-Dx9rESL>
 

 

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or 
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized 
to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are 
hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the 
information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete 
it from your system.

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to