On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 8:42 AM Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 9/30/2020 8:39 AM, Seth Blank wrote: > > * <xs:element name="disposition" type="DispositionType"/>* > > > Since quibbling is always more fun than dealing with substance... > > Given the recent exchange about 'dispose', perhaps "handling" is a safer > vocabulary choice? > > d/ > Dave, please open a ticket about vocabulary within DMARC that you think requires modification to be clearer and/or safer (like "dispose", which has now been raised in two separate threads), and we'll tackle those language changes separately with respect to the entire body of documents instead of within the scope of singular issues. > > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > -- *Seth Blank* | VP, Standards and New Technologies *e:* [email protected] *p:* 415.273.8818 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
