On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 1:41 PM Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > All > > During the chairs call this morning we were discussing the upcoming > meeting. Now Seth has a conflict with the meeting time that can't be > altered. Since work items have been progressing rather well recently, and > the editors are in positing, we discussed canceling the meeting. We wanted > to get some feedback from the working group. > > Here is a lightweight agenda Seth put together. Should we 1) have a > meeting around these topics; 2) discuss other topics or 3) cancel the > meeting and keep moving along. > > [snip] > I vote option 3. There's quite a lot of meaty discussion to be had on these topics, and I can't see any of them reaching consensus or anything close to it during the 30 minutes or so each would be allotted. -- *Todd Herr* | Sr. Technical Program Manager *e:* [email protected] *p:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
