So what’s the conclusion on this? I still see the dmarc meeting on the
agenda page, but without any agenda or meeting materials (unlike
virtually every other WG meeting).
-Jim
On 13 Nov 2020, at 12:26, Tim Wicinski wrote:
Dave
It's the latter. Alexey and I are quite fine with running the
meeting,
that was part of our conversation.
tim
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 3:23 PM Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote:
On 11/13/2020 10:40 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
During the chairs call this morning we were discussing the upcoming
meeting. Now Seth has a conflict with the meeting time that can't
be
altered. Since work items have been progressing rather well
recently,
and the editors are in positing, we discussed canceling the meeting.
We
wanted to get some feedback from the working group.
Here is a lightweight agenda Seth put together. Should we 1) have a
meeting around these topics; 2) discuss other topics or 3) cancel
the
meeting and keep moving along.
Four days before a scheduled, rare meeting, it's being canceled
because
one of its 3 chairs can't attend?
Or because it has suddenly been realized that the meeting won't be
useful?
Really?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
