I'm discussing this with the chairs and they or I will get back to you shortly.
-MSK, ART AD On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 4:38 PM Jim Fenton <[email protected]> wrote: > So what’s the conclusion on this? I still see the dmarc meeting on the > agenda page, but without any agenda or meeting materials (unlike virtually > every other WG meeting). > > -Jim > > On 13 Nov 2020, at 12:26, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > > Dave > > It's the latter. Alexey and I are quite fine with running the meeting, > that was part of our conversation. > > tim > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 3:23 PM Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 11/13/2020 10:40 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote: >> > During the chairs call this morning we were discussing the upcoming >> > meeting. Now Seth has a conflict with the meeting time that can't be >> > altered. Since work items have been progressing rather well recently, >> > and the editors are in positing, we discussed canceling the meeting. >> We >> > wanted to get some feedback from the working group. >> > >> > Here is a lightweight agenda Seth put together. Should we 1) have a >> > meeting around these topics; 2) discuss other topics or 3) cancel the >> > meeting and keep moving along. >> >> >> Four days before a scheduled, rare meeting, it's being canceled because >> one of its 3 chairs can't attend? >> >> Or because it has suddenly been realized that the meeting won't be useful? >> >> Really? >> >> d/ >> -- >> Dave Crocker >> Brandenburg InternetWorking >> bbiw.net >> > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
