On 2 Dec 2020, at 1:47, Laura Atkins wrote:
p=quarantine is quite useful, particularly for those folks who are
trying to get to a p=reject state.
In practice, senders who publish p=none don’t find all of the
indirect mail flows as some mailing lists do nothing to transform the
5322.from address for a p=none policy. Senders have found that when
they switch from p=none to p=quarantine pct=0 they regularly find mail
that was not failing for a p=none.
I’m really confused by this. It sounds like the 5322.from address
rewriting is creating additional errors that didn’t exist beforehand,
and that’s the opposite of the intended purpose. Isn’t the purpose
of rewriting the 5322.from address to change the domain to that of the
mediator, which should redirect reporting to the mediator rather than
the original sender?
-Jim
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
