In article <caba8r6utadmz-o23w-c3qmhmhofnsub68_ski8-q0ofduqy...@mail.gmail.com> you write: >Anyways, +1 to keeping p=quarantine as a concept, but willing to go along >with the consensus on naming.
I'm modestly in favor of keeping p=quarantine as a feature but utterly opposed to changing the keywords such as "p=quarantine" in the DMARC record. It's fine to improve the text in the RFC that describes what they mean but let us please not make gratuitously incompatible changes. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
