On 12/5/20 5:47 PM, John Levine wrote:
In article <[email protected]> you write:
The domain owner might want all sorts of unreasonable things. Having a
way to let the domain owner publish demands that are widely ignored
indicates a seriously flawed semantic model. And that is, indeed, the
current reality for DMARC.
Thanks. Lest anyone think this is a new issue, see this message I sent
to the DKIM list in 2006, fourteen years ago:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-dkim/CBsHbUVtM512vgiwljiA6dtVJ1Q/#
I reprised it six years ago in 2014:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ngPmSfa0b_B5Q72G1JwzGG2IYKY/
because a domain owner might want an unreasonable thing doesn't imply
that a domain owner can't want a reasonable thing. this is a logical
fallacy designed to dismiss any request as unreasonable.
Mike
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
