On 12/30/20 8:22 AM, Dotzero wrote:
You just stated the case as to why this discussion should be ruled out
of scope. " DMARC != Auth-res." and " DMARC in auth-res seems to be
an orphan"
This is the IETF DMARC working group, not the AUTH-RES working group.
You gave the example of someone writing a crappy Thunderbird extension
as a reason for the working group to change its focus. Perhaps getting
the extension author to fix their extension might be a more fruitful
effort.
Let me put this another way:
"The verifying DMARC SHOULD encode its results into an
Authentication-Results header [RFC 8601] for downstream MTA's, MDA's,
and MUA in the same administrative domain, and those downstream entities
SHOULD use the Authentication-Results so as to not put undue burden on
the DNS infrastructure".
Anything that would cause them to have to violate that SHOULD is a
problem that needs to be resolved.
Mike, getting tired of the circularity going on here
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
