Your focus on email, as somehow distinctive, would need some basis
for ignoring the web experience. Feel free to provide it.
Your example of web is fraught because web stuff has had visual
indicators for decades now, and trying to compare EV certs isn't
especially a good example because the situations are not the same. At
least this study is directly relevant and it doesn't support your
categorical statement. This is actually a Good Thing.
Oh? A trust indicator to a user, flagging a domain name, isn't pretty
much the same? Please explain.
At least this study is directly relevant and it doesn't support your
categorical statement. This is actually a Good Thing.
It is largely unrelated to my observation about efficacy of trust
indicators for average users..
I did provide it with that paper. You seem to be dismissing it out of
hand in favor of something that isn't even email based. We are here
because of email, so I think that's pretty relevant.
Except that I didn't 'dismiss' it, out of hand or otherwise.
You really should read the paper.
Your implication that I haven't is both odd and troublesome.
In 15 minutes? It's like 30 pages long and very technical. And you're
asking me whether I read it closely? If you have read it before, just
say that. If you haven't you can skip to the part that doesn't support
your categorical statement.
sigh.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
[email protected]
408.329.0791
Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
