On Wed 06/Jan/2021 00:55:41 +0100 Dave Crocker wrote:
On 1/5/2021 3:50 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
Quit cutting out needed context to make your points. The study directly
contradicts your categorical statement.
Except that it doesn't.
Feel free to provide an serious explanation of why you think otherwise, but
please put some effort into accurately representing what I said or what the
study shows. Attention to detail will help. Conclusions are less important
than showing your work.
The report says:
This returns the email-opening rate of 53.4% and 48.9%. Among these users,
the corresponding click-through rates are 48.9% (without security
indicator) and 37.2% (with security indicator) respectively. The
results indicate that security indicators have a positive impact to reduce
risky user actions.
https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity18/sec18-hu.pdf
You said:
My point is that we have decades of belief that it's useful but no
demonstration that it actually is. And we have history such as the EV
effort, showing that it isn't.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/r7unHaCXKKFeotbjU1pL-Jx4f_o
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
