On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 7:26 AM Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > No, you are literally telling everyone else how things were. In fact, > there was a lot of data. You are the one who claimed that everything was in > your head and the rest of us have no clue. - "DKIM itself was a leap of > faith" and that we were doing things based on opinion and conjecture. It > did not take 16 years for there to be data. There was data before DK and > IIM were merged to form DKIM. > > What data? Data that showed what? That's completely news to me. You > weren't even part of the informal group who caused DKIM to be created, iirc. > Everyone,
A working group charter is in some sense a contract between the IESG and the working group regarding what work it will do, how it will do it, and what its deliverables are. I hope it's clear that the discussion taking place here does nothing in service of that contract. Please get yourselves back on track without undue delay. -MSK, your increasingly irritable Area Director
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
