On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:19 PM Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
> No it was an unalloyed good that you brought that up. We can use a much > more data-driven approach rather than opinion and conjecture. It would > be good for it to be required reading for everybody on this working > group, and not snarled at as a heresy. DKIM itself was a leap of faith. > 16 years later it is gratifying that we have data. > > Mike > DKIM was NOT a leap of faith. At the time there was plenty of data from DK (Domain Keys) and IIM to inform those involved. Please stop making assertions of "fact" which are simply not true. Michael Hammer
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
